Who should
make these decisions and how will these decisions be made?

Determining who makes the
decisions and how the decisions will be made relies on the structure of the
organization. 

First let’s talk about the
importance of the decision itself.  Every
outcome is  the result of a decision  – either made or failed to be made by someone. Many
companies struggle with getting decisions made at all. I’ve seen progress grind
to a halt for the lack of a decision. Any decision please! 

Making good decisions quickly is
the hallmark of a high performing organization.  Harvard Business Review wrote a wonderful
article “Who has the D?” back in 2006.  http://hbr.org/2006/01/who-has-the-d-how-clear-decision-roles-enhance-organizational-performance/ar/1
 . It is such a great article it is available
for sale on Amazon as well!

Okay we have that out of the way.
Let’s move on. 

Making a good decision quickly is
dependent on clear ownership of the right to make the decision.  The organizational structure of any company
results in decision-making authority throughout various levels in the
organization.  

From here on let’s discuss an
example of how a fictional company’s corporate structure effects IT decision
making and governance. For the sake of illustration I will call the
organization “Company”

The primary vehicles for Company
strategy providing governance to the IT functions most likely will or should
act as follows:

  • The Company Executive Team (CET) will set the guiding business
    principles that define the role of IT in the business.  When acting in this role, the CET will
    collaborate with the Company board team to ensure maximum alignment with the
    goals and mission of the organization.
  • In global or multi-divisional companies the divisional or business
    area leadership will collaborate with IT to specify the business capabilities
    needed to support the business strategy.  The capabilities outline by the Business Leadership Team (BLT) will
    result in defining the need for modifying existing or acquiring new applications
    and services, either purchased or new. 
    They also guide business unit IT requirements relative to alignment with
    the strategic needs of the business. 
  • The IT Portfolio Oversight
    Committee (ITPOC)
    will approve all IT projects, strategies, and initiatives,
    as well as capital and operational budgets related to enabling their business
    services.  Think of the ITPOC as a board
    of directors.  They should guide and
    approve strategy and spend but stay out of the operational delivery of the
    projects.  Sometimes that is easier said
    than done.  
  • The Program Management
    Office (PMO)
    is expected to monitor progress and expenditures against the
    approved project plan and to conduct gate reviews at defined critical points in
    the development/installation process. 
  • The Project Steering Committees (PSC) are expected to resolve issues
    and conflicts, to ensure continued alignment with the goals of the business and
    ensure functional user participation and ownership throughout the life cycle of
    each project.
  • The IT Leadership Team (ITLT) will set and maintain the principles that
    guide IT architecture and infrastructure decisions. The ITLT will deal with
    policies, relationships and technical choices to achieve desired business and
    technical standardization and integration. 
    The ITLT will also set key infrastructure standards and directions that
    apply to all business units to ensure a consistent and sharable foundation for
    IS capability.

The ITLT relies on input from the
functional IT leadership team to define the principles and determine the
standards, policies etc. Operating within these principles, standards and
policies, the ITLT will delegate or authorize operating level decisions to the
functional leaders.   

A key consideration is to drive
operating level decisions as low as possible based on risk to the organization.
Good decision making depends on assigning clear and specific roles as well.  This sounds simple on paper but is in fact an
area most companies struggle because many people feel accountable. When many
people feel accountable most often no one takes actions. Worse yet, the wrong
person may take the wrong action. 

The HBR article outline above
lays out a “Decision-Making Primer” that I particularly like.  In this primer they introduce a tool called “RAPID”.    The letters
in RAPID mean

R = Recommend.  These are the people who have or will:   

  • Recommend course of action
  • Gather input by consulting with others and generating buy in along the
    way
  • Provide the right data and analysis
  • Make a sensible and timely proposal

A = Agree.  This is the person who can:

  • Veto or approve the recommendation
    (should be very few people)
  • Engage the recommendation in a discussion/ debate that leads to a
    modified proposal
  • If that takes too long or they cannot agree they escalate to the person
    with the ‘D’

P = Perform.  This is the person or team who:

  • Execute on the decision
    (often the ones who make the recommendation)
  • Work with defined roles, responsibilities and processes as well as
    flexibility

I = Input.  This are the people who:

  • Provide the relevant facts that are the basis of good decisions
  • Often are responsible to implement the decision
  • Give non-binding input

D = Decide.  This is the person who is responsible for:

  •  Be the single point of accountability
  • Exercise good business judgment, grasp the relevant trade-offs, have a
    bias for action and a keen awareness of the organization
  • Resolve any impasse
  • Bring the decision to a close
  • Commit the organization to action

The three trouble spots in most
organization are the lack of clarity around who really has the “D”; a
proliferation of people with veto power; and the proliferation of people providing
input.  This is where the inclusion of organizational
change management in all major initiatives is very helpful.  A simple piece of advice
is to clarify at the beginning of the program the decision making responsibility
matrix.    

It is easy to see that an effective
approach to decision making
is in the best interests for IT and the organization overall.  

Next
time will discuss “How IT supports these
decisions

Conversations
sponsored by ITeffectivity.com – an IT management consulting practice targeting
CIO’s challenge of leading and delivering business solutions with a focus on
effective people, process, and technology management.